Xiao-Fei Li (李小飞)

Professor Information

University

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Position

___

Citations(all)

411048

Citations(since 2020)

189503

Cited By

149521

hIndex(all)

309

hIndex(since 2020)

200

i10Index(all)

1834

i10Index(since 2020)

1629

Email

University Profile Page

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Research & Interests List

Nanoelectronics

Spintronics

Nanophotonics

Top articles of Xiao-Fei Li (李小飞)

Observation of decays to and

Using a data sample of 4.481× 10 8 ψ (3686) events collected with the BESIII detector, we report the first observation of the four-lepton-decays J/ψ→ e+ e− e+ e− and J/ψ→ e+ e− μ+ μ− utilizing the process ψ (3686)→ π+ π− J/ψ. The branching fractions are determined to be [5.48±0.31 (stat)±0.45 (syst)]× 10− 5 and [3.53±0.22 (stat)±0.13 (syst)]× 10− 5, respectively. The results are consistent with theoretical predictions. No significant signal is observed for J/ψ→ μ+ μ− μ+ μ−, and an upper limit on the branching fraction is set at 1.6× 10− 6 at the 90% confidence level. A C P asymmetry observable is constructed for the first two channels, which is measured to be (− 0.012±0.054±0.010) and (0.062±0.059±0.006), respectively. No evidence for C P violation is observed in this process.

Authors

M Ablikim,MN Achasov,P Adlarson,S Ahmed,M Albrecht,R Aliberti,A Amoroso,MR An,Q An,XH Bai,Y Bai,O Bakina,R Baldini Ferroli,I Balossino,Y Ban,K Begzsuren,N Berger,M Bertani,D Bettoni,F Bianchi,J Bloms,A Bortone,I Boyko,RA Briere,H Cai,X Cai,A Calcaterra,GF Cao,N Cao,SA Cetin,JF Chang,WL Chang,DY Chen,G Chen,HS Chen,ML Chen,SJ Chen,XR Chen,YB Chen,ZJ Chen,WS Cheng,G Cibinetto,F Cossio,XF Cui,HL Dai,JP Dai,XC Dai,A Dbeyssi,RE de Boer,D Dedovich,ZY Deng,A Denig,I Denysenko,M Destefanis,F De Mori,Y Ding,C Dong,J Dong,LY Dong,MY Dong,X Dong,SX Du,YL Fan,J Fang,SS Fang,Y Fang,R Farinelli,L Fava,F Feldbauer,G Felici,CQ Feng,JH Feng,M Fritsch,CD Fu,Y Gao,YG Gao,I Garzia,PT Ge,C Geng,EM Gersabeck,K Goetzen,L Gong,WX Gong,W Gradl,M Greco,LM Gu,MH Gu,S Gu,YT Gu,CY Guan,AQ Guo,LB Guo,RP Guo,YP Guo,A Guskov,TT Han,WY Han,XQ Hao,FA Harris,H Hüsken,KL He,FH Heinsius,CH Heinz,T Held,YK Heng,C Herold,M Himmelreich,T Holtmann,YR Hou,ZL Hou,HM Hu,JF Hu,T Hu,Y Hu,GS Huang,LQ Huang,XT Huang,YP Huang,Z Huang,T Hussain,W Ikegami Andersson,W Imoehl,M Irshad,S Jaeger,S Janchiv,Q Ji,QP Ji,XB Ji,XL Ji,HB Jiang,XS Jiang,JB Jiao,Z Jiao,S Jin,Y Jin,T Johansson,N Kalantar-Nayestanaki,XS Kang,R Kappert,M Kavatsyuk,BC Ke,IK Keshk,A Khoukaz,P Kiese,R Kiuchi,R Kliemt,L Koch,OB Kolcu,B Kopf,M Kuemmel

Journal

Physical Review D

Published Date

2024/3/18

Amplitude Analysis of and

Using annihilation data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.93 taken at the center-of-mass energy ~GeV with the BESIII detector, a joint amplitude analysis is performed on the decays and (non-). The fit fractions of individual components are obtained, and large interferences among the dominant components of , , and are found in both channels. With the obtained amplitude model, the -even fractions of and (non-) are determined to be and , respectively. The branching fractions of and (non-) are measured to be and , respectively. The amplitude analysis provides an important model for binning strategy in the measurements of the strong phase parameters of when used to determine the CKM angle via the decay.

Authors

Medina Ablikim,Mikhail N Achasov,P Adlarson,Orestis Afedulidis,XC Ai,Riccardo Aliberti,Antonio Amoroso,Qi An,Yu Bai,Olga Bakina,I Balossino,Y Ban,H-R Bao,V Batozskaya,K Begzsuren,N Berger,M Berlowski,M Bertani,D Bettoni,F Bianchi,E Bianco,A Bortone,I Boyko,RA Briere,A Brueggemann,H Cai,X Cai,A Calcaterra,GF Cao,N Cao,SA Cetin,JF Chang,WL Chang,GR Che,C Chen,CH Chen,Chao Chen,G Chen,HS Chen,ML Chen,SJ Chen,SL Chen,SM Chen,T Chen,XR Chen,XT Chen,YB Chen,YQ Chen,ZJ Chen,ZY Chen,SK Choi,X Chu,G Cibinetto,F Cossio,JJ Cui,HL Dai,JP Dai,A Dbeyssi,RE de Boer,D Dedovich,CQ Deng,ZY Deng,A Denig,I Denysenko,M Destefanis,F De Mori,B Ding,XX Ding,Y Ding,J Dong,LY Dong,MY Dong,X Dong,MC Du,SX Du,ZH Duan,P Egorov,YH Fan,J Fang,SS Fang,WX Fang,Y Fang,YQ Fang,R Farinelli,L Fava,F Feldbauer,G Felici,CQ Feng,JH Feng,YT Feng,K Fischer,M Fritsch,CD Fu,JL Fu,YW Fu,H Gao,YN Gao,Yang Gao,S Garbolino,I Garzia,PT Ge,ZW Ge,C Geng,EM Gersabeck,A Gilman,K Goetzen,L Gong,WX Gong,W Gradl,S Gramigna,M Greco,MH Gu,YT Gu,CY Guan,ZL Guan,AQ Guo,LB Guo,MJ Guo,RP Guo,YP Guo,A Guskov,J Gutierrez,KL Han,TT Han,XQ Hao,FA Harris,KK He,KL He,FH Heinsius,CH Heinz,YK Heng,C Herold,T Holtmann,PC Hong,GY Hou,XT Hou,YR Hou,ZL Hou,BY Hu,HM Hu,JF Hu,T Hu,Y Hu,GS Huang,KX Huang,LQ Huang,XT Huang,YP Huang,T Hussain,F Hölzken

Journal

arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02524

Published Date

2023/12/5

Measurement of the double-differential muon-neutrino charged-current inclusive cross section in the NOvA near detector

We report cross-section measurements of the final-state muon kinematics for ν μ charged-current interactions in the NOvA near detector using an accumulated 8.09× 10 20 protons on target in the NuMI beam. We present the results as a double-differential cross section in the observed outgoing muon energy and angle, as well as single-differential cross sections in the derived neutrino energy, E ν, and square of the four-momentum transfer, Q 2. We compare the results to inclusive cross-section predictions from various neutrino event generators via χ 2 calculations using a covariance matrix that accounts for bin-to-bin correlations of systematic uncertainties. These comparisons show a clear discrepancy between the data and each of the tested predictions at forward muon angle and low Q 2, indicating a missing suppression of the cross section in current neutrino-nucleus scattering models.

Authors

MA Acero,P Adamson,L Aliaga,N Anfimov,A Antoshkin,E Arrieta-Diaz,L Asquith,A Aurisano,A Back,M Baird,N Balashov,P Baldi,BA Bambah,S Bashar,K Bays,B Behera,R Bernstein,V Bhatnagar,D Bhattarai,B Bhuyan,J Bian,J Blair,AC Booth,R Bowles,C Bromberg,N Buchanan,A Butkevich,S Calvez,TJ Carroll,E Catano-Mur,BC Choudhary,A Christensen,TE Coan,M Colo,L Cremonesi,GS Davies,PF Derwent,P Ding,Z Djurcic,M Dolce,D Doyle,D Dueñas Tonguino,EC Dukes,H Duyang,S Edayath,R Ehrlich,M Elkins,E Ewart,GJ Feldman,P Filip,J Franc,MJ Frank,HR Gallagher,R Gandrajula,F Gao,A Giri,RA Gomes,MC Goodman,V Grichine,M Groh,B Guo,A Habig,F Hakl,A Hall,J Hartnell,R Hatcher,H Hausner,M He,K Heller,V Hewes,A Himmel,A Holin,J Huang,B Jargowsky,J Jarosz,F Jediny,C Johnson,M Judah,I Kakorin,A Kalitkina,D Kalra,DM Kaplan,R Keloth,O Klimov,LW Koerner,L Kolupaeva,S Kotelnikov,R Kralik,Ch Kullenberg,M Kubu,A Kumar,CD Kuruppu,V Kus,T Lackey,K Lang,P Lasorak,J Lesmeister,S Lin,A Lister,J Liu,M Lokajicek,S Magill,M Manrique Plata,WA Mann,ML Marshak,M Martinez-Casales,V Matveev,B Mayes,DP Méndez,MD Messier,H Meyer,T Miao,WH Miller,SR Mishra,A Mislivec,R Mohanta,A Moren,A Morozova,W Mu,L Mualem,M Muether,K Mulder,D Naples,N Nayak,JK Nelson,R Nichol,E Niner,A Norman,A Norrick,T Nosek,H Oh,A Olshevskiy,T Olson,J Ott,J Paley,RB Patterson,G Pawloski,O Petrova,R Petti,DD Phan,RK Plunkett,JCC Porter,A Rafique,V Raj,M Rajaoalisoa,B Ramson,B Rebel,P Rojas,P Roy,V Ryabov

Journal

Physical Review D

Published Date

2023/3/27

Amplitude analysis and branching fraction measurement of the decay D+ → π+π0π0

Home> Physical Review D (APS)> Amplitude analysis and branching fraction measurement of< mrow>< msup>< mrow>< mi> D< mrow>< mn> 0< mo>→< msup>< mrow>< mi> K< mrow>< mo>−< msup>< mrow>< mi> π< mrow>< mo>+< msup>< mrow>< mi> π< mrow>< mn> 0< msup>< mrow>< mi> π< mrow>< mn> 0

Authors

M Kuemmel,MX Luo,FF Sui,XR Zhou,JB Liu,T Hussain,T Held,XH Sun,M Kuessner,FH Heinsius,JY Zhang,LY Dong,L Xia,T Li,JH Yin,SF Zhang,X Tang,M Qi,S Lusso,Y Hu,XK Zhou,SL Olsen,Ling Zhao,G Mezzadri,YM Ma,LH Wu,YF Long,WL Chang,M Rolo,S Zhu,A Mangoni,XS Jiang,QP Ji,JY Liu,A Zhemchugov,L Yan,K Goetzen,JL Zhang,K Peters,A Rivetti,HP Peng,WX Gong,YG Gao,M Kornicer,XR Lyu,MH Gu,RP Guo,XT Huang,M Wang,S Pacetti,B Zheng,FC Ma,SB Liu,BS Zou,I Boyko,M Destefanis,SX Du,ZQ Yang,Fang Liu,M Albrecht,D Wang,MN Achasov,XS Qin,JZ Zhang,Cheng Li,Ke Liu,A Kupsc,Q Gao,B Liu,F Cossio,SA Cetin,Y Ban,SJ Chen,JS Lange,YB Liu,T Weber,BY Zhang,YT Tan,YZ Sun,Q Zhou,U Wiedner,YK Heng,W Shan,KL He,T Hu,ZX Meng,HY Sheng,LS Wang,X Xia,C Dong,J Pellegrino,Z Jiao,LL Ma,ZH Qin,RG Ping,WD Li,X Shi,DP Jin,G Rong,D Bettoni,WM Song,CD Fu,S Marcello,YH Yang,Z Ning,J Pettersson,KY Liu,Z Haddadi,A Calcaterra,Feng Liu,N Yu Muchnoi,CF Redmer,M Richter,HM Liu,L Zhou,N Berger,I Uman,MH Ye,S Sosio,HH Wang,YT Gu,I Garzia,XY Niu,CX Yu,Huihui Liu,Q An,JQ Zhang,CJ Tang,A Denig,J Zhang,YB Zhao,D Dedovich,J Libby,L Xu,OB Kolcu,YS Zhu,IK Keshk,S Han,XY Ma,XZ Huang,YT Zhang,HB Li,A Guskov,SH Zhu,N Qin,DM Li,QL Xiu,TJ Zhang,M Tiemens,M Shao

Journal

Physical Review D

Published Date

2019/5/31

Measurement of cross sections at center-of-mass energies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV

Using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 651 pb− 1 accumulated at 22 center-of-mass energies from 2.00 to 3.08 GeV by the BESIII experiment, the process e+ e−→ ϕ π+ π− is studied. The cross sections for e+ e−→ ϕ π+ π− are consistent with previous results, but with improved precision. To measure the mass and width of the structure observed in the cross section line shape, a combine fit is performed after enhancing the contribution from ϕ f 0 (980). The fit reveals a structure with the mass of M= 2178±20±5 MeV/c 2 and the width of Γ= 140±36±16 MeV, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second ones are systematic.

Authors

M Ablikim,MN Achasov,P Adlarson,R Aliberti,A Amoroso,MR An,Q An,Y Bai,O Bakina,I Balossino,Y Ban,V Batozskaya,K Begzsuren,N Berger,M Berlowski,M Bertani,D Bettoni,F Bianchi,E Bianco,J Bloms,A Bortone,I Boyko,RA Briere,A Brueggemann,H Cai,X Cai,A Calcaterra,GF Cao,N Cao,SA Cetin,JF Chang,TT Chang,WL Chang,GR Che,C Chen,Chao Chen,G Chen,HS Chen,ML Chen,SJ Chen,SM Chen,T Chen,XR Chen,XT Chen,YB Chen,YQ Chen,ZJ Chen,WS Cheng,SK Choi,X Chu,G Cibinetto,SC Coen,F Cossio,JJ Cui,HL Dai,JP Dai,A Dbeyssi,RE de Boer,D Dedovich,ZY Deng,A Denig,I Denysenko,M Destefanis,F De Mori,B Ding,XX Ding,Y Ding,J Dong,LY Dong,MY Dong,X Dong,SX Du,ZH Duan,P Egorov,YL Fan,J Fang,SS Fang,WX Fang,Y Fang,R Farinelli,L Fava,F Feldbauer,G Felici,CQ Feng,JH Feng,K Fischer,M Fritsch,C Fritzsch,CD Fu,YW Fu,H Gao,YN Gao,Yang Gao,S Garbolino,I Garzia,PT Ge,ZW Ge,C Geng,EM Gersabeck,A Gilman,K Goetzen,L Gong,WX Gong,W Gradl,S Gramigna,M Greco,MH Gu,YT Gu,CY Guan,ZL Guan,AQ Guo,LB Guo,RP Guo,YP Guo,A Guskov,XT Hou,WY Han,XQ Hao,FA Harris,KK He,KL He,FH Heinsius,CH Heinz,YK Heng,C Herold,T Holtmann,PC Hong,GY Hou,YR Hou,ZL Hou,HM Hu,JF Hu,T Hu,Y Hu,GS Huang,KX Huang,LQ Huang,XT Huang,YP Huang,T Hussain,N Hüsken,W Imoehl,M Irshad,J Jackson,S Jaeger,S Janchiv,JH Jeong,Q Ji,QP Ji,XB Ji

Journal

Physical Review D

Published Date

2023/8/15

Detector signal characterization with a Bayesian network in XENONnT

We developed a detector signal characterization model based on a Bayesian network trained on the waveform attributes generated by a dual-phase xenon time projection chamber. By performing inference on the model, we produced a quantitative metric of signal characterization and demonstrate that this metric can be used to determine whether a detector signal is sourced from a scintillation or an ionization process. We describe the method and its performance on electronic-recoil (ER) data taken during the first science run of the XENONnT dark matter experiment. We demonstrate the first use of a Bayesian network in a waveform-based analysis of detector signals. This method resulted in a 3% increase in ER event-selection efficiency with a simultaneously effective rejection of events outside of the region of interest. The findings of this analysis are consistent with the previous analysis from XENONnT, namely a …

Authors

E Aprile,K Abe,S Ahmed Maouloud,L Althueser,B Andrieu,E Angelino,JR Angevaare,VC Antochi,D Antón Martin,F Arneodo,L Baudis,AL Baxter,M Bazyk,L Bellagamba,R Biondi,A Bismark,EJ Brookes,A Brown,S Bruenner,G Bruno,R Budnik,TK Bui,C Cai,JMR Cardoso,D Cichon,AP Cimental Chavez,AP Colijn,J Conrad,JJ Cuenca-García,JP Cussonneau,V D’Andrea,MP Decowski,P Di Gangi,S Di Pede,S Diglio,K Eitel,A Elykov,S Farrell,AD Ferella,C Ferrari,H Fischer,M Flierman,W Fulgione,C Fuselli,P Gaemers,R Gaior,A Gallo Rosso,M Galloway,F Gao,R Glade-Beucke,L Grandi,J Grigat,H Guan,M Guida,R Hammann,A Higuera,C Hils,L Hoetzsch,NF Hood,J Howlett,M Iacovacci,Y Itow,J Jakob,F Joerg,A Joy,N Kato,M Kara,P Kavrigin,S Kazama,M Kobayashi,G Koltman,A Kopec,F Kuger,H Landsman,RF Lang,L Levinson,I Li,S Li,S Liang,S Lindemann,M Lindner,K Liu,J Loizeau,F Lombardi,J Long,JAM Lopes,Y Ma,C Macolino,J Mahlstedt,A Mancuso,L Manenti,F Marignetti,T Marrodán Undagoitia,K Martens,J Masbou,D Masson,E Masson,S Mastroianni,M Messina,K Miuchi,K Mizukoshi,A Molinario,S Moriyama,K Morå,Y Mosbacher,M Murra,J Müller,K Ni,U Oberlack,B Paetsch,J Palacio,Q Pellegrini,R Peres,C Peters,J Pienaar,M Pierre,V Pizzella,G Plante,TR Pollmann,J Qi,J Qin,D Ramírez García,R Singh,L Sanchez,JMF Dos Santos,I Sarnoff,G Sartorelli,J Schreiner,D Schulte,P Schulte,H Schulze Eißing,M Schumann,L Scotto Lavina,M Selvi,F Semeria,P Shagin,S Shi,E Shockley,M Silva,H Simgen,A Takeda,P-L Tan,A Terliuk,D Thers,F Toschi,G Trinchero,C Tunnell,F Tönnies,K Valerius,G Volta

Journal

Physical review D

Published Date

2023/7/26

Observation of and Measurements of Decay Dynamics

By analyzing 7.33 fb of annihilation data collected at center-of-mass energies between 4.128 and 4.226 GeV with the BESIII detector, we report the observation of the semileptonic decay and studies of the and decay dynamics for the first time. The branching fractions of and are determined to be and , respectively, with precision improved by factors of 5.9 and 6.5 compared to the previous best measurements. Combined with the results for the decays and , the ratios of the decay widths are examined, both inclusively and in several four-momentum transfer ranges. No evidence for lepton flavor universality violation is found within the current statistics. The products of the hadronic form factors and the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element are determined. The results based on the two-parameter series expansion are and , which constrain present models on . The mixing angle in the quark flavor basis is determined to be .

Authors

Medina Ablikim,Mikhail N Achasov,P Adlarson,Riccardo Aliberti,Antonio Amoroso,MR An,Qi An,Yu Bai,Olga Bakina,Ilaria Balossino,Y Ban,V Batozskaya,K Begzsuren,N Berger,M Berlowski,M Bertani,D Bettoni,F Bianchi,E Bianco,J Bloms,A Bortone,I Boyko,RA Briere,A Brueggemann,H Cai,X Cai,A Calcaterra,GF Cao,N Cao,SA Cetin,JF Chang,TT Chang,WL Chang,GR Che,C Chen,Chao Chen,G Chen,HS Chen,ML Chen,SJ Chen,SM Chen,T Chen,XR Chen,XT Chen,YB Chen,YQ Chen,ZJ Chen,WS Cheng,SK Choi,X Chu,G Cibinetto,SC Coen,F Cossio,JJ Cui,HL Dai,JP Dai,A Dbeyssi,RE de Boer,D Dedovich,ZY Deng,A Denig,I Denysenko,M Destefanis,F De Mori,B Ding,XX Ding,Y Ding,J Dong,LY Dong,MY Dong,X Dong,SX Du,ZH Duan,P Egorov,YL Fan,J Fang,SS Fang,WX Fang,Y Fang,R Farinelli,L Fava,F Feldbauer,G Felici,CQ Feng,JH Feng,K Fischer,M Fritsch,C Fritzsch,CD Fu,YW Fu,H Gao,YN Gao,Yang Gao,S Garbolino,I Garzia,PT Ge,ZW Ge,C Geng,EM Gersabeck,A Gilman,K Goetzen,L Gong,WX Gong,W Gradl,S Gramigna,M Greco,MH Gu,YT Gu,CY Guan,ZL Guan,AQ Guo,LB Guo,RP Guo,YP Guo,A Guskov,WY Han,XQ Hao,FA Harris,KK He,KL He,FH Heinsius,CH Heinz,YK Heng,C Herold,T Holtmann,PC Hong,GY Hou,YR Hou,ZL Hou,HM Hu,JF Hu,T Hu,Y Hu,GS Huang,KX Huang,LQ Huang,XT Huang,YP Huang,T Hussain,N Hüsken,W Imoehl,M Irshad,J Jackson,S Jaeger,S Janchiv,JH Jeong,Q Ji,QP Ji,XB Ji,XL Ji

Journal

arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12852

Published Date

2023/7/24

Precision Measurements of and

Precision measurements of the semileptonic decays D s+→ η e+ ν e and D s+→ η′ e+ ν e are performed with 7.33 fb− 1 of e+ e− collision data collected at center-of-mass energies between 4.128 and 4.226 GeV with the BESIII detector. The branching fractions obtained are B (D s+→ η e+ ν e)=(2.255±0.03 9 stat±0.05 1 syst)% and B (D s+→ η′ e+ ν e)=(0.810±0.03 8 stat±0.02 4 syst)%. Combining these results with the B (D+→ η e+ ν e) and B (D+→ η′ e+ ν e) obtained from previous BESIII measurements, the η− η′ mixing angle in the quark flavor basis is determined to be ϕ P=(40.0±2.0 stat±0.6 syst). Moreover, from the fits to the partial decay rates of D s+→ η e+ ν e and D s+→ η′ e+ ν e, the products of the hadronic transition form factors f+ η (′)(0) and the modulus of the c→ s Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element| V c s| are determined by using different hadronic transition form factor parametrizations …

Authors

Medina Ablikim,Mikhail N Achasov,P Adlarson,Riccardo Aliberti,Antonio Amoroso,MR An,Qi An,Yu Bai,Olga Bakina,Ilaria Balossino,Y Ban,V Batozskaya,K Begzsuren,N Berger,M Berlowski,M Bertani,D Bettoni,F Bianchi,E Bianco,J Bloms,A Bortone,I Boyko,RA Briere,A Brueggemann,H Cai,X Cai,A Calcaterra,GF Cao,N Cao,SA Cetin,JF Chang,TT Chang,WL Chang,GR Che,C Chen,Chao Chen,G Chen,HS Chen,ML Chen,SJ Chen,SM Chen,T Chen,XR Chen,XT Chen,YB Chen,YQ Chen,ZJ Chen,WS Cheng,SK Choi,X Chu,G Cibinetto,SC Coen,F Cossio,JJ Cui,HL Dai,JP Dai,A Dbeyssi,RE de Boer,D Dedovich,ZY Deng,A Denig,I Denysenko,M Destefanis,F De Mori,B Ding,XX Ding,Y Ding,J Dong,LY Dong,MY Dong,X Dong,SX Du,ZH Duan,P Egorov,YL Fan,J Fang,SS Fang,WX Fang,Y Fang,R Farinelli,L Fava,F Feldbauer,G Felici,CQ Feng,JH Feng,K Fischer,M Fritsch,C Fritzsch,CD Fu,JL Fu,YW Fu,H Gao,YN Gao,Yang Gao,S Garbolino,I Garzia,PT Ge,ZW Ge,C Geng,EM Gersabeck,A Gilman,K Goetzen,L Gong,WX Gong,W Gradl,S Gramigna,M Greco,MH Gu,YT Gu,CY Guan,ZL Guan,AQ Guo,LB Guo,RP Guo,YP Guo,A Guskov,H XT,TT Han,WY Han,XQ Hao,FA Harris,KK He,KL He,FHH Heinsius,CH Heinz,YK Heng,C Herold,T Holtmann,PC Hong,GY Hou,YR Hou,ZL Hou,HM Hu,JF Hu,T Hu,Y Hu,GS Huang,KX Huang,LQ Huang,XT Huang,YP Huang,T Hussain,N Hüsken,W Imoehl,M Irshad,J Jackson,S Jaeger,S Janchiv,JH Jeong,Q Ji

Journal

Physical Review D

Published Date

2023/11/6

Professor FAQs

What is Xiao-Fei Li (李小飞)'s h-index at University of Electronic Science and Technology of China?

The h-index of Xiao-Fei Li (李小飞) has been 200 since 2020 and 309 in total.

What are Xiao-Fei Li (李小飞)'s research interests?

The research interests of Xiao-Fei Li (李小飞) are: Nanoelectronics, Spintronics, Nanophotonics

What is Xiao-Fei Li (李小飞)'s total number of citations?

Xiao-Fei Li (李小飞) has 411,048 citations in total.

What are the co-authors of Xiao-Fei Li (李小飞)?

The co-authors of Xiao-Fei Li (李小飞) are Jinlong Yang, Luo Yi - KTH, Wei-Qing Huang, Huiqiu Deng (邓辉球), Dajun Ding, Hao Ren(任浩).

Co-Authors

H-index: 114
Jinlong Yang

Jinlong Yang

University of Science and Technology of China

H-index: 92
Luo Yi - KTH

Luo Yi - KTH

Kungliga Tekniska högskolan

H-index: 49
Wei-Qing Huang

Wei-Qing Huang

Hunan University

H-index: 38
Huiqiu Deng (邓辉球)

Huiqiu Deng (邓辉球)

Hunan University

H-index: 30
Dajun Ding

Dajun Ding

Jilin University

H-index: 25
Hao Ren(任浩)

Hao Ren(任浩)

China University of Petroleum

academic-engine

Useful Links